Thursday, December 9, 2010

When you are traveling you always have baggage

Whether we are going for an overnight stay or an extended trip abroad, we will have baggage. Luggage of some size will be going with us, even if it is just the clothes on our backs, we have things that come along with us for good or bad. The same holds true in the Christian realm when we invite people to speak. Like the guest we invited to our home they will come with baggage, some good and some bad. We must determine ahead of time whether the baggage is something we wish to deal with or not. For the believer this determining is not done by our own wits or reason. God has given us His Word and has clearly laid out what determines acceptable baggage.
God has put forth Romans 16:17, “Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.” and II Thess. 3:6, 14, 15, “Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us. And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed. Yet count him not as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother.” These passages guide us in the process of “baggage screening.” Sadly, many today, who claim to hold to the Word of God and accept its mandates, are ignoring or deliberately twisting God’s Word to accommodate some baggage.
A recent example of this is Northland International University. Back on October 5th Rick Holland, an elder from Grace Community Church in CA (where John MacArthur is the senior elder), spoke in chapel. One then asks; what kind of baggage did Rick Holland bring with him? Well, let’s look. For starters, as already noted, he comes from MacArthur’s church. MacArthur is the most prolific advocate for Lordship Salvation. Between his books, The Gospel According to Jesus, and Hard to Believe, he has made it abundantly clear that his view of salvation is one that the unconverted must consciously submit to the implications of discipleship in order for salvation, justification to actually take place.[1] This is not the gospel that Paul articulates in Ephesians 2:8, 9, “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast,” or in Romans 10:9, 10, 13, “That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.” Nor is LS expressed in I Corinthians 15:1-4, “Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures.”
Another piece of baggage with Rick Holland is his Resolved Conference. A conference for young people supposedly based upon Jonathan Edward’s list of resolutions. With the worldly music that is foisted upon the listeners as being Christian, it is a sad spectacle of a charismatic style, emotion laden experience which is somehow supposed to assist the audience in reaching a closer relationship with the Lord. James is clear enough when he states, “Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God,” (James 4:4). John is also clear, “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever,” (I John 2:15-17). When we bring in the world’s method and message into Christianity we are left with the constant degradation that the world brings with it in order to keep the current crowd and to entice the newcomer.
This baggage came to Northland with Rick Holland, whether Dr. Olson wanted it or not. While Rick Holland’s message was spot on (I listened to the message), this baggage came along for the ride as well and has as much influence on the audience as the message did. For by his presence, Northland gives tacit acceptance for this baggage. It would be interesting to know how many Northland students will be at the Resolved Conference in June and in following years.
Another example at Northland is the recent visit by Wayne Simien of Called to Greatness Ministries. He spoke in chapel on November 18th. A visit to his website (www.iamctg.org) reveals his baggage. Your ears are bombarded by “Christian” rap music by various artists. A look at the camps that are available and you soon see that there are two “dance” camps for girls age 8 to 17. Again, a worldliness method to convey the message of the King of kings and Lord of lords to a world greatly in need, I think not. Wayne’s baggage came with him and again Northland gives tacit acceptance for this baggage. Will Northland’s camp ministry be extending itself by recommending its female campers to Wayne’s dance camps during the summer?
There is a future example with which I will close this article. Northland has invited in Dr. Bruce Ware from Southern Seminary to teach in their Doctor of Ministry program. What baggage does Dr. Ware bring? Well, for one he is a Southern Baptist coming into an independent Baptist university. Another piece of baggage that comes with him is his progressive dispensationalism. Dr. Ware was a contributing author for the book, Dispensationalism, Israel and the Church, edited by Craig Blaising and Darrell Bock. This was the first book published to espouse this new view of dispensationalism. You may ask, what is progressive dispensationalism? I encourage the reader to obtain a copy of Charles Ryrie’s book, Dispensationalism. In chapter 9 he goes into detail outlining the tenets of progressive dispensationalism. In a nutshell, it is an effort by some to bring in or reconcile Covenant Theology with Dispensationalism. Dr. Ryrie, in chapter 9 of his book, lists the basic tenets of progressive dispensationalism and I list them here:
1.      The kingdom of God is the unifying theme of biblical history.
2.      Within biblical history there are four dispensational eras.
3.      Christ has already inaugurated the Davidic reign in heaven at the right hand of the Father, which equals the throne of David, though He not yet reigns as Davidic king on earth during the Millennium.
4.      Likewise, the new covenant has already been inaugurated, though its blessings are not yet fully realized until the Millennium.
5.      The concept of the church as completely distinct from Israel and as a mystery unrevealed in the Old Testament needs revising, making the idea of two purposes and two peoples of God invalid.
6.      A complementary hermeneutic must be used alongside a literal hermeneutic. This means that the New Testament makes complementary changes to the Old Testament promises without jettisoning those original promises.
7.      The one divine plan of holistic redemption encompasses all people and all areas of human life—personal, societal, cultural, and political.
(Italics are Ryrie’s)
Dr. Bruce Ware along with Dr. Andy Naselli will be teaching a class in the summer modular of the Doctor of Ministry program titled, Models of Sanctification. With the progressive dispensationalist’s “holistic redemption” approach to the doctrine of salvation, we are left to greatly wonder about the impact that thought has one’s understanding of sanctification, which is defined as “a separation to God, an imputation of Christ as our holiness, purification from moral evil, and conformation to the image of Christ,” (Thiessen, Lectures in Systematic Theology, p. 287).
The “baggage” that these three men (Holland, Ware, Simien) and their respective ministries bring do not pass the “baggage screening” criteria that God has given to us in His Word. As such they ought to then be denied access to our services. Just as the baggage screeners at our nation’s airport are to be alert to potential harmful substances, so to we are to be ever vigil in our “screening” process of speakers that will hold the attention of our congregations and our young people while they seek their education.
Dr. Matt Olson has done a poor job at “screening!” It is debatable whether or not immediate harm has been done to NIU’s impressionable young people. While the above listed men may not have caused immediate harm, the gate has been opened for others who may very well cause direct harm, but then all that can be done will be clean up. Dr. Olson, for the sake of fidelity to the Lord and His Word, renounce this loose “screening” process and return to the Scriptural mandates.
For those who erroneously think that unless you have a vested interest in a ministry or institution then you have no credibility in bringing concerns or criticisms (calling it “clouds without rain”); I have from my church three graduates of Northland and one former student home working so that they can finish (which they are now considering to be at another institution). One of those three who have graduated currently works on campus. So, yes, I do have a vested interest in the ministry of Northland and even if I did not, the concerns and criticisms remain the same.


[1] Follow these links for a detailed explanation: http://indefenseofthegospel.blogspot.com/2008/07/summary-of-lordship-salvation-on-single.html and http://indefenseofthegospel.blogspot.com/2010/10/let-your-yes-be-kinda-sorta.html I would also recommend that you purchase a copy of Lou Martuneac’s book, details are there at the web site.

12 comments:

Don Johnson said...

baggage... useful metaphor, Brian

Maranatha!
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3

Brian said...

Thanks for coming by Bro. Johnson, and yes, I thought the metaphor was very appropos.

Gary said...

Brother Brian,

I, too, found your baggage metaphor most helpful in getting us to see the seriousness of what is happening at Northland and some other Fundamental institutions. May I suggest that a follow-up article on the baggage of Andy Naselli might also be helpful. I appreciate your humble spirit in setting forth these very critically important concerns.

Lou Martuneac said...

Brian:

Thanks for this important contribution to the discussion over the changes being brought to Northland. It is sad to see what NIU is becoming. The men who should be the gatekeepers for their young charges are swinging the doors wide open for men and influences that will cause harmful effects.


LM

Brian said...

Bro. Gary, thanks for stopping by as well. It is a bit of a side issue, though may very well be related, and that is why our young men are heading off to New Evangelical schools for advanced degrees. Andy Naselli is a BJU grad but went elsewhere for his doctorate. Decades ago, it was understandable, the Fundamentalist institutions did not have the seminaries in place to train. That is not the case anymore, yet many have gone elsewhere and yes, they too are bringing baggage back. The previous generations that had to go understood the differences and for the most part weathered those differences unharmed. These today seem to lack the discernment to see and understand that there are differences and they are significant. They "swallow the kool-aid" so to speak of the New Evangelicalism and think that there is no big deal about those differences. Sad, very sad.

Brian said...

Bro. Lou,

Yes, it is disturbing to see the dropping of the standard for the sake of compromise. This convergence of Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism has been fueled from within academia and is forming a tension between the local church and its acceptable training institutions. It use to be that colleges and seminaries understood their position in cooperation, that they were servants to the church. They seem to want to become the master in this relationship.
A moderator at another blog site went so far as to suggest that the recent re-assignment of a seminary president to that of a research position, if done in more schools, would be that which would save Fundamentalism. A real heaven sent revival into the hearts of the believers in the pews of our churches will be that which keeps Christianity thriving; not the pontificating of academia on the minutiae of doctrinal differences within the broad spectrum that claims Christian beliefs.
This is not to say I am against education, for I am very much in favor of it. I have some of it myself. But it is not the be-all-end-all of seeing the cause of Christ prosper in this generation and the next.

Lou Martuneac said...

Brian:

As I noted to you at my blog...

The real tragedy is that the push and influence to depart from fidelity to the God given mandates for separation is coming from men who once were or still claim to be a Fundamentalist separatist. There is no longer any question that academics like Dave Doran, Kevin Bauder, and now sadly we have to include Matt Olson at NIU, have been attempting a paradigm shift on the separation that has in principle and application served us so well for so many decades.

No we are told separation can include, tolerance and allowances for the aberrant doctrine, worldliness and ecumenism of evangelicals. This new trend toward a "pure gospel," which is a drift away from separation for the sake of a “pure church” is contributing to the breakdown of fidelity to biblical separation. As long as there can be agreement around Calvinistic soteriology in the form of Lordship Salvation the rest is relegated to a non-essential that might otherwise preclude fellowship and cooperation with the evangelicals.

I am so grateful that more voices are speaking up to warn the NT church that we are being influenced in a direction that has at its end New Evangelicalism, not to mention Charismatic theology.


Lou

Arlyn Ubben said...

I have been out of the loop after a 4 year pause in my Doctoral program at Northland and have not kept up on things that are going on there. I am glad they are departing from the curse of tertiary separation which has plagued fundamentalism for so long.

Brian said...

Bro. Ubben,
Thanks for stopping by. Sorry to disagree with you but I do. "Tertiary" separation?! A bit of sarcasm? Heard of the naysayers coming up with "second degree" but "tertiary." Unless, Northland has changed their doctrinal position (which last I looked they had not) the men mentioned in the article hold to doctrine contrary to Northland's. It's not "secondary" or "tertiary" to call on Dr. Olson to do a better job.
And if you will reread the article you will find I have not stated that I or anyone else should separate from Northland (though I am aware that some have). So, for those who try to say I am calling for a form of separation that is "secondary" is erroneous.
Please, show me how having these men come to campus to speak and influencing our young people toward evangelicalism is a good thing?

Lou Martuneac said...

Arlyn:

"I am glad they are departing from..."

But Dr. Olson still inists NIU is NOT changing.


LM

Arlyn Ubben said...

No sarcasm intended Brian. Tertiary separation has long been a factor in Fundamentalism. "I" separate from "him" because "he" shook hands with "someone" who spoke for another preacher who led in prayer at a conference which contained a speaker with whom "I" did not agree on some point or opinion. I saw it when I was a student at BJU. I have experienced it applied to me. I have witnessed it applied to others.

Calvinism, church polity, Dispensationalism and such doctrines are all important, but they are not the fundamentals of the faith with which we must agree. Early Fundamentalists were all over the map on these issues.

Brian said...

Bro. Ubben, please read my last comment to you. I will note again, first, I have not called for separation. Second, I will grant your hypothetical expression has been done both in the past and in the present, it is not indicative however, of fundamentalism in the main, never has been. Segments, persons, yes, but not accross the board.
Which leads me back to the article, is there a point of disagreement? By your statements you seem to imply that having these men in to speak and thus exposing our young people to their respective ministries and giving tacit endorsement to those ministries is a good thing. Let's go back in time to set up this situation. Let's suppose your children are back in their teen years/college age. Are you saying that you wouldn't mind your girls going to Simien's dance camp? Are you saying you wouldn't mind sending them to the Resolved Conference in CA? That is what Northland has said by bringing these men in to speak. And as far as Simien is concerned, as noted in that chapel, Northland is partnered with Simien's ministry by the student intern.
Granted, early fundamentalism was a diverse group of individuals on those issues. But we're not talking about fundamentalists partnering with other fundamentalists. Holland, Simien, and Ware are not fundamentalists; self-identified, closet, or practicing fundamentalists but ignorant of that term to be applied to them. So that idea is not valid for in reference to my article.